🟢Wasabi vs Amazon S3🪣
S3 is the object storage standard with tiers, lifecycle rules and a vast ecosystem. Wasabi undercuts it with flat, low-cost storage and no egress or API request fees.
Run a moomz poll: who wins for you?
moomz.com — 10s, anonymous, free
🟢Wasabi
- ✓Flat, very low per-GB storage pricing
- ✓No egress fees and no API request charges
- ✓S3-compatible API for easy migration
- ✓Simple, predictable billing
🪣Amazon S3
- ✓The de facto standard with the deepest ecosystem
- ✓Rich storage tiers and lifecycle automation
- ✓Tight integration across the AWS stack
- ✓Unmatched tooling and third-party support
Verdict
Wasabi wins for cheap, predictable storage and backups where egress would hurt. S3 wins when you need its ecosystem depth, tiering and AWS integration.
Frequently asked
Does Wasabi charge for egress?+
No, Wasabi has no egress or API request fees, just flat storage pricing.
Is Wasabi S3-compatible?+
Yes, Wasabi exposes an S3-compatible API for easy migration and tooling.
When is S3 the better choice?+
S3 wins when you need tiering, lifecycle automation and deep AWS ecosystem integration.
Also in