🔺GraphQL vs REST🔗
REST organizes APIs around resources and HTTP verbs, while GraphQL exposes a single endpoint where clients request exactly the data they need.
Run a moomz poll: who wins for you?
moomz.com — 10s, anonymous, free
🔺GraphQL
- ✓Clients fetch exactly the fields they need
- ✓One request can gather data from many sources
- ✓Strong typed schema with self-documentation
- ✓No over-fetching or under-fetching of data
🔗REST
- ✓Simple, well-understood HTTP-based model
- ✓Easy caching with standard HTTP infrastructure
- ✓Lower learning curve and ubiquitous tooling
- ✓Maps naturally to resources and CRUD
Verdict
Pick GraphQL for complex, data-rich clients that need flexible queries. Pick REST for simple APIs where HTTP caching and broad familiarity matter most.
Frequently asked
Is GraphQL replacing REST?+
No — REST remains dominant; GraphQL is one option that shines for complex client needs.
Which is easier to cache?+
REST caches naturally with HTTP; GraphQL needs more deliberate caching strategies.
Which is simpler to build?+
REST has a lower barrier; GraphQL adds power at the cost of extra setup.
Also in