๐ขWasabi vs Amazon S3๐ชฃ
S3 is the object storage standard with tiers, lifecycle rules and a vast ecosystem. Wasabi undercuts it with flat, low-cost storage and no egress or API request fees.
Run a moomz poll: who wins for you?
moomz.com โ 10s, anonymous, free
๐ขWasabi
- โFlat, very low per-GB storage pricing
- โNo egress fees and no API request charges
- โS3-compatible API for easy migration
- โSimple, predictable billing
๐ชฃAmazon S3
- โThe de facto standard with the deepest ecosystem
- โRich storage tiers and lifecycle automation
- โTight integration across the AWS stack
- โUnmatched tooling and third-party support
Verdict
Wasabi wins for cheap, predictable storage and backups where egress would hurt. S3 wins when you need its ecosystem depth, tiering and AWS integration.
Frequently asked
Does Wasabi charge for egress?+
No, Wasabi has no egress or API request fees, just flat storage pricing.
Is Wasabi S3-compatible?+
Yes, Wasabi exposes an S3-compatible API for easy migration and tooling.
When is S3 the better choice?+
S3 wins when you need tiering, lifecycle automation and deep AWS ecosystem integration.
Also in