moomz
/vsยทtechยทen

๐Ÿ”ดRedis vs Memcached๐Ÿ’พ

Memcached is a simple, fast in-memory cache for strings. Redis is a richer in-memory data store with structures, persistence, pub/sub and far more capability.

Run a moomz poll: who wins for you?
moomz.com โ€” 10s, anonymous, free
โ†’
๐Ÿ”ดRedis
  • โœ“Rich data structures: lists, sets, sorted sets, hashes
  • โœ“Optional persistence and replication
  • โœ“Pub/sub, streams and built-in scripting
  • โœ“Versatile beyond plain caching
๐Ÿ’พMemcached
  • โœ“Extremely simple and lightweight
  • โœ“Excellent multithreaded performance for caching
  • โœ“Very low memory overhead per item
  • โœ“Easy to scale horizontally for pure caching

Verdict

Redis wins for almost any use case beyond plain caching thanks to its rich features. Memcached wins as a lean, multithreaded cache when you only need simple key-value speed.

Frequently asked

Is Redis faster than Memcached?+

Both are very fast; Memcached's multithreading can help pure caching, Redis offers far more features.

Does Memcached persist data?+

No, Memcached is purely in-memory; Redis can optionally persist to disk.

Which should I use for caching?+

Either works; Redis is the safer all-rounder, Memcached suits simple high-throughput caching.

Also in

More in tech

Run a moomz poll: who wins for you?