๐ดRedis vs Memcached๐พ
Memcached is a simple, fast in-memory cache for strings. Redis is a richer in-memory data store with structures, persistence, pub/sub and far more capability.
Run a moomz poll: who wins for you?
moomz.com โ 10s, anonymous, free
๐ดRedis
- โRich data structures: lists, sets, sorted sets, hashes
- โOptional persistence and replication
- โPub/sub, streams and built-in scripting
- โVersatile beyond plain caching
๐พMemcached
- โExtremely simple and lightweight
- โExcellent multithreaded performance for caching
- โVery low memory overhead per item
- โEasy to scale horizontally for pure caching
Verdict
Redis wins for almost any use case beyond plain caching thanks to its rich features. Memcached wins as a lean, multithreaded cache when you only need simple key-value speed.
Frequently asked
Is Redis faster than Memcached?+
Both are very fast; Memcached's multithreading can help pure caching, Redis offers far more features.
Does Memcached persist data?+
No, Memcached is purely in-memory; Redis can optionally persist to disk.
Which should I use for caching?+
Either works; Redis is the safer all-rounder, Memcached suits simple high-throughput caching.
Also in