moomz
/vsยทtechยทen

โš™๏ธGraphQL Code Generator vs QuickType๐Ÿ” 

GraphQL Code Generator builds types from a GraphQL schema, while QuickType generates types from JSON samples or schemas. Schema-driven versus sample-driven.

Run a moomz poll: who wins for you?
moomz.com โ€” 10s, anonymous, free
โ†’
โš™๏ธGraphQL Code Generator
  • โœ“Generates accurate types from a GraphQL schema
  • โœ“Plugins for hooks, resolvers and many frameworks
  • โœ“Keeps frontend types in sync with the API
  • โœ“Deep integration with the GraphQL ecosystem
๐Ÿ” QuickType
  • โœ“Generates types from raw JSON examples
  • โœ“Supports many target languages, not just TypeScript
  • โœ“Works without any formal schema
  • โœ“Handy for quick one-off type generation

Verdict

Pick GraphQL Code Generator when you have a GraphQL schema to stay in sync with. Pick QuickType to derive types from JSON samples across many languages.

Frequently asked

Does QuickType need a schema?+

No โ€” QuickType can infer types directly from JSON sample data.

Which fits GraphQL projects?+

GraphQL Code Generator, since it is built around the GraphQL schema.

Which supports more languages?+

QuickType targets many languages, while GraphQL Codegen focuses on the GraphQL ecosystem.

Also in

More in tech

Run a moomz poll: who wins for you?